HOW BUSINESSES CAN COPE
IN THE NEW GLOBAL TRADE
ENVIRONMENT
As a
result of globalization,
governments are
modernizing their
international
trade-related
legislation. New
concepts have been
introduced in Customs
and international trade
legislation.
Business’ response to
the new legislation is a
new concept to define
the challenges and
opportunities unique to
the new international
business environment,
namely global trade
management. Companies
need to employ a
strategy and use global
trade management
solutions to succeed in
the new global trade
arena. In other words
they need to automate
their businesses. That
will not be an easy
task. There are many
companies that claim to
provide the best global
trade management
solutions but it is a
daunting task to choose
the best solution for
your company.
In
the quest to maintain a
profitable global supply
chain, technology is
just as important as
human know-how. At
least, that's what
supply chain consulting
firm Tompkins
International found in
2013, when it surveyed
80 companies for its Global
Trade Management (“GTM”)
Report.
Companies have to become
globally competitive
through customs
compliance, reduced
costs (for example, by
avoiding supply chain
delays and penalties),
increased productivity
and increased shipping
performance.
No
company could achieve
this in isolation. The
smaller the company, the
more assistance they
will need from their
supply chain partners
and service and solution
providers.
Implementing GTM
solutions alone is not
the alpha and the
omega. 74% of
respondents told
Tompkins International
they were implementing
technology solutions
however, the same
percentage said that
they were ensuring their
staff were well-trained.
Inbound Logistics
Magazine feature
article, in the March
2014 edition, states
that it is paramount for
companies to choose that
best GTM solution, and –
just as important – the
investment must work for
that company.
GTM
solutions help shippers
optimize, automate, and
monitor transactions
with trading partners
and service providers.
It
has always been
important for companies
that are trading
internationally to
comply with their own
Customs legislation as
well as with that your
partner. It is becoming
more important in the
modern era. GTM
software assists the
user with complying with
the customs requirements
in more than one country
since GTM solution
providers focus on
customs compliance in
more than one country.
However, one needs to
investigate if the
solution provider
focuses on the Customs
legislation of the
country your partner
resides in.
As an
example, it is of no use
if a GTM solution
provider’s solutions are
able to conduct denied
party screenings, assign
product classification
codes, determine duty
and tariff obligations
in the United States,
submit US customs
documents, and transmit
data required by
agencies such as the
U.S. Food and Drug
Administration if you
are not dealing with the
United States.
There
will be dramatic
operational and cash
flow benefits to be
gained by businesses
that comply with global
trade regulations and
use the best global
trade management
solutions. There is a
money-saving
motivational point if
your companies use GTM
solutions
however, it will require
a lot of dedication,
commitment and research
from top management down
to your operational
staff. And you will need
well-trained staff. |
|
The
International Trade
Administration
Commission
(ITAC)
is responsible for
tariff investigations,
amendments, and trade
remedies in South Africa
and on behalf of SACU.
Tariff investigations
include:
Increases in the customs
duty rates in
Schedule No. 1 Part 1 of
Jacobsens. These
applications apply to
all the SACU Countries,
and, if amended, thus
have the potential to
affect the import duty
rates in Botswana,
Lesotho, Namibia,
Swaziland and South
Africa.
Reductions in the
customs duty rates in
Schedule No. 1 Part 1.
These applications apply
to all the SACU
Countries, and, if
amended, thus have the
potential to affect the
import duty rates in
Botswana, Lesotho,
Namibia, Swaziland and
South Africa.
Rebates of duty on
products, available in
the Southern African
Customs Union (SACU),
for use in the
manufacture of goods, as
published in Schedule
No. 3 Part 1, and in
Schedule No. 4 of
Jacobsens. Schedule No.
3 Part 1 and Schedule
No. 4, are identical in
all the SACU Countries.
Rebates of duty on
inputs used in the
manufacture of goods for
export, as published in
Schedule No. 3 Part 2
and in item 470.00.
These provisions apply
to all the SACU
Countries.
Refunds of duties and
drawbacks of duties as
provided for in Schedule
No. 5. These provisions
are identical in the all
the SACU Countries.
Trade
remedies include:
Anti-dumping duties (in
Schedule No. 2 Part 1 of
Jacobsens),
countervailing duties to
counteract subsidisation
in foreign countries (in
Schedule No. 2 Part 2),
and safeguard duties
(Schedule No. 2 Part 3),
which are imposed as
measures when a surge of
imports is threatening
to overwhelm a domestic
producer, in accordance
with domestic law and
regulations and
consistent with WTO
rules.
Dumping is
defined as a situation
where imported goods are
being sold at prices
lower than in the
country of origin, and
also causing financial
injury to domestic
producers of such goods.
In other words, there
should be a demonstrated
causal link between the
dumping and the injury
experienced. |
To
remedy such unfair
pricing, ITAC may, at
times, recommend the
imposition of
substantial duties on
imports or duties that
are equivalent to the
dumping margin (or to
the margin of injury, if
this margin is lower).
Countervailing
investigations are
conducted to determine
whether to impose
countervailing duties to
protect a domestic
industry against the
unfair trade practice of
proven subsidised
imports from foreign
competitors that cause
material injury to a
domestic producer.
Safeguard measures,
can be introduced to
protect a domestic
industry against
unforeseen and
overwhelming foreign
competition and not
necessarily against
unfair trade, like the
previous two
instruments.
In
the WTO system, a member
may take a safeguard
action, which is,
restricting imports
temporarily in the face
of a sustained increase
in imports that is
causing serious injury
to the domestic producer
of like products.
Safeguard measures are
universally applied to
all countries, unlike
anti-dumping and
countervailing duties
that are aimed at a
specific firm or
country.
Schedule No. 2 is
identical in all the
SACU Countries.
ITAC
published no
applications to amend
the tariff.
The
last notice that ITAC
has published was a
notice to initiate a
sunset review on the
anti-dumping duties on
fresh or chilled garlic
imported from or
originating in China.
The Notice (Government
Notice R. 244 of 2015)
was published in Government
Gazette 38574
on 20 March 2015.
Comments were due by 3
April 2015.
Refer
to the Bulletin of 1
April 2015 for more
information. |
|
With
the exception of certain
parts of Schedule No. 1,
such as Schedule No. 1
Part 2 (excise duties),
Schedule No. 1 Part 3
(environmental levies)
Schedule No. 1 Part 5
(fuel and road accident
fund levies), the other
parts of the tariff is
amended by SARS based on
recommendations made by
ITAC resulting from the
investigations relating
to Customs Tariff
Applications received by
them. The ITAC then
investigates and makes
recommendations to the
Minister of Trade and
Industry, who requests
the Minister of Finance
to amend the Tariff in
line with the ITAC’s
recommendations. SARS is
responsible for drafting
the notices to amend the
tariff, as well as for
arranging for the
publication of the
notices in Government
Gazettes.
During the annual budget
speech by the Minister
of Finance in February,
it was determined that
parts of the tariff that
are not amended
resulting from ITAC
recommendations, must be
amended through
proposals that are
tabled by the Minister
of Finance.
Once
a year big tariff
amendments are published
by SARS, which is in
line with the
commitments of South
Africa and SACU under
international trade
agreements.
Under
these amendments, which
are either published in
November or early in
December, the import
duties on goods are
reduced under South
Africa’s international
trade commitments under
existing trade
agreements.
|
There
were no tariff
amendments at time of
publication. The last
tariff amendments were
published on 27 March
2015 and were dealt with
in last week’s Bulletin
dated 1 April 2015.
The
amendments of 27 March
2015 were published in
Government Gazette
38611 of 27 March 2015
and they have been
published to give effect
to the Taxation
Proposals of the
Minister of Finance in
relation to:
The
abolishment of ad
valorem excise
duty on digital cinema
projectors above R250
000;
The
increase of fuel levy on
petrol and on diesel
with effect from 1 April
2015;
The
increase in the road
accident fund (RAF) levy
on petrol and diesel
with effect from 1 April
2015; and
Amendments consequential
to these amendments in
Part 3 of Schedule No.
6.
The
tariff amendments were
sent to subscribers
under cover of
Supplement 1046.
Download the
two latest Customs Watch
to have access to the
latest tariff
amendments. |
|
The
Customs and Excise Act
is amended by the
Minister of Finance.
Certain provisions of
the Act are supported by
Customs and Excise
Rules, which are
prescribed by the
Commission of SARS.
These provisions are
numbered in accordance
with the sections of the
Act. The rules are more
user-friendly than the
Act, and help to define
provisions which would
otherwise be unclear and
difficult to interpret.
Forms
are also prescribed by
rule, and are published
in the Schedule to the
Rules. |
Forms
are also prescribed by
rule, and are published
in the Schedule to the
Rules.
The
rule amendment (DAR/144)
was published on 27
March 2015 in
Government Gazette
38603 under Notice R.
246.
Download the
latest Customs Watch to
have access to the
latest tariff and rule
amendments. |
|